Saturday, 31 of July of 2010

Archives from author » millie

DIY Kyoto, Wattson Energy Monitor Design Competition

DIY Kyoto, the team of Royal College of Art graduates behind the multi award-winning energy monitor wattson, that The Guardian described as ‘the closest we’ve come yet to an iPod of smart meters’ have launched a student design competition, inviting aspiring designers to create a new graphic design for the exterior of the wattson. Find out how to enter here.

Working from the original wattson design template, applicants’ designs will be judged by a high-profile judging panel, including the Head of Creative at Selfridges, and Wallpaper Magazine’s Art and Design Editor, jotta Editor Millie Ross and Max Fraser of the London Design Guide.

The competition will give applicants a platform for their work to be seen by influential figures from the art and design world, and the winning design will be made into a limited edition version of the Wattson, which will be stocked in Wattson’s retail outlets nationwide.

Green technology experts and independent design collective DIY Kyoto was established in 2005 by three RCA graduates: Greta Corke (Interaction Design), Jon Sawdon Smith (Industrial Design) and Richard Woods (Industrial Design). They presented the worldwide launch of their inaugural product at the Milan Salone del Mobile in 2006 and the first ever Wattson 01 previewed at the Milan Salone del Mobile 2007.

The Wattson is a designer energy monitor which has been proven to help households save up to 20% on their electricity bill, an average annual saving of approx. £280. It’s simple operation, smart design(“I Am Gorgeous” is his tagline), and renewable energy have garnered Wattson a huge amount of praise in the design and eco realms, helping people understand and control their personal impact on the environment.

The competition deadline is Friday 12 March find out more about how to enter here.

www.diykyoto.com

  • Share/Bookmark

Claiming Creativity Symposium

A joint international symposium presented by Columbia College Chicago in partnership with the European League of Institutes of the Arts, Claiming Creativity: Art Education in Cultural Transition

A joint international symposium presented by Columbia College Chicago in partnership with the European League of Institutes of the Arts, Claiming Creativity: Art Education in Cultural Transition.

April 21-24, 2010, Chicago, USA

Online Registration closes 14 April, 2010

http://claimingcreativity.com/registration.php

Claiming Creativity seeks to re-position creativity as a driver not only for our economies, but also for art making, for transformational processes, and for social and cultural development and change. The working assumption is that the vitality of our common future is linked tightly to creative practice in many forms. This symposium will place artists, designers, architects and other active “creators,” and those who teach in the creative disciplines squarely at the center of these important conversations along with leaders in industry and commerce who share an interest in the life of the imagination and its value to society.

Educators and other leaders in the arts, business, science, commerce, industry, public policy, and environment are invited to attend.


Claiming Creativity also features an online forum, live and available now to all symposium registrants. Successful proposal abstracts are included on the forum and allow for pre-symposium discourse to begin shaping the Chicago symposium; the forum discussions will also provide additional ideas for special sessions at the Chicago symposium, making Claiming Creativity as interactive as possible for the symposium registrants. Additionally, a symposium “journal” will be published through Columbia College Chicago’s academic press.

Claiming Creativity keynote speakers include Sarat Maharaj (UK), Dany Jacobs (Netherlands), and Amina J. Dickerson (USA). Their vast cultural knowledge and influence will undoubtedly afford symposium attendees new perspectives on “Claiming Creativity” and “the life of imagination and its value to society.”

For details about the symposium, registration, and the keynote speakers, please visit: http://claimingcreativity.com

  • Share/Bookmark

How They Did It: Elise Foster Vander Elst of Gallery BMB

Keen on an international art career? Elise Foster Vander Elst is commercial director of Gallery BMB, India. She tells how she carved a career in the global art world, helping to launch an art space in Mumbai with a debut show featuring contemporary art greats the Chapman brothers, Jon Kessler, Riyas Komu, George Osodi, Tunga and Wang Qingsong.

By Barnaby Tidman

Keen on an international art career? Elise Foster Vander Elst is commercial director of Gallery BMB, India. She tells how she carved a career in the global art world, helping to launch an art space in Mumbai with a debut show featuring contemporary art greats the Chapman brothers, Jon Kessler, Riyas Komu, George Osodi, Tunga and Wang Qingsong.

What’s your background?

After leaving school in the UK, I moved to Paris and completed a BA in history of art at the Sorbonne. I realised I was particularly interested in contemporary art, and decided a great place to learn about it in more depth would be New York, so then I went to the big apple to work at MoMA-PS1 and ArtReview magazine, and loved every minute of it.

I thought it best to have a masters, so returned to Paris to do an MA in contemporary art, where I specialised in performance art.

How did you become involved in launching a gallery in India?

After my Masters I joined a small Parisian gallery, and its director was interested in bringing more Indian art to France. I helped research interesting artists, contact them and plan exhibitions, and was fortunate enough to build good relationships with some brilliant artists.

Then I went to work for a British auction house in Paris. I began to realise that to properly delve into the Indian contemporary art world, I had to be in India. Returning from a holiday in Delhi, I was standing at the luggage carousel of Charles de Gaule airport when Bose Krishnamachari called me to discuss a new gallery he was planning with long-term art patrons Dia and Devaunshi Mehta and Avanti Birla.

What’s been the high point of your work at the BMB so far?

Bringing 39 works, by 7 artists from 5 continents, to Mumbai for The Dark Science of Five Continents exhibition.

Which Indian artists would you particularly recommend?

Where to start? If I had to narrow it down- Prasad Raghavan; Charmi Gada Shah; PS Jalaja’s fresh large scale, beautiful pastel works; Tejal Shah (whose works always keep this incredible balance between being challenging and aesthetically beautiful); Riyas Komu; I adore Bose Krishnamachari’s installations; and Sumedh Rajendran’s solo show was one of the best gallery exhibitions I have ever seen.

What advice would you give to a young person with dreams of an international art career?

Visit every single gallery show in the town where you live. If you are lucky enough to live near museums, go to every exhibition, and if you can afford it and the show was good, buy the catalogue or at the very least take the press release. Read every art magazine you can get your hands on, remember names, be respectful to everyone you meet – but always stand up for yourself. Finally, as unglamorous as it sounds, work really really really hard. It’s the only way.

Image: Gallery BMB, Shankar Natarajan. Courtesy Gallery BMB.

  • Share/Bookmark

Copyright

One of the four main types of intellectual property rights (or “IPR”) is “copyright”. This is quite a well known term in artist and design circles but surprisingly is very often a misused term.

Copyright gives creators of original works (called “copyright works”), such as artwork, illustrations, pieces of writing and even software code, legal rights allowing the creator to stop reproduction of that work by others without the creator’s permission. Copyright does not need to be registered with any Government agency to exist, it exists automatically when an original copyright work is created and the first owner is automatically the creator of that work. The duration of copyright for most types of creative work is 70 years after the death of the original creator.

If copyright exists in a copyright work it is illegal for anyone to make copies of that copyright work without the creator’s permission. It is also illegal for anyone to issuing copies of that copyright work to the public or reproduce it on the Internet (or to broadcast that copyright work if it is music or film) without the permission of the creator, i.e. the original artist or designer.

One issue that is sometimes overlooked is where an artist or a designer is working for someone else when they create copyright works. This will affect ownership. If an artist or designer is employed by a company or other person, then when that artist or designer as an employee creates a new creative work, the copyright in that creative work is automatically owned by the artist or designer’s employer. However, the opposite is the case if the artist or designer is self-employed and working for clients on a freelance basis. In the latter situation, the artist or designer would automatically be the owner of the creative works he or she creates even where the client has instructed them to do it and paid the artist or designer to do the work. Because of this, it is a good idea for all artists/ designers to have a simple agreement for work they do for clients which covers the issue of IPR. This will normally be a Freelancer Agreement.

Whoever is the owner of copyright in creative works, they will be able to give permission to others to use their work commercially (this is called an IPR licence) in return for regular payments (licence fees or royalties) or if a company or person wants to buy copyright in certain creative works outright from the owner for a one off lump sum this can be done by way of an IPR assignment. Both are common in the art and design world. If copyright works are assigned, this will not change the duration of the copyright which will still last until the end of the seventieth year after the death of the original creator, regardless that the original creator no longer owns the copyright because it has been assigned to someone else.

It is worth remembering that copyright does not protect ideas, or such things asnames or subject titles. So, for example, a painting of a still life with a clever theme will not stop other artists staging still life on the same theme and producing paintings of them. The same goes for ideas for creative works; for example, if you write down a summary of an idea for a piece of creative work that you are planning to produce, copyright in that written work will only allow you to stop someone copying the written words, and will not allow you to stop them from producing the envisioned work summarised in writing.

Image by Slaven Gabric, Don’t walk !

  • Share/Bookmark

How to Manage your Creative Work and Intellectual Property Online

An brilliant article by Yanko Design, who discovered the unceremonious theft and unlicensed reproduction of a unique and clever little product, The Pocket Light, which had previously received rave reviews across design blogdom in 2008.

This post was originally created by Yanko Design, who recently reported on the nasty theft of a design; The Pocket Light by Hyun Jin Yoon & Eun Hak Lee (Ryan Harc),

The Pocket Light was stolen, produced and sold unlicensed under another brand. The original light-design had garnered much attention from the online community in 2008.
ORIGINAL POCKET LIGHT

intellectual_light

COPY OF THE POCKET LIGHT

intellectual_light2

In many ways the Internet is a new medium when it comes to the management of intellectual property. Many designers are still struggling to reconcile its power of reach versus control of information flow. Here are some thoughts on managing creative content on the Internet.

1) Managing Expectations

Whenever a design is shown to the public there is a chance it could get ripped off. Design awards, graduation shows, public critiques, discussions with model makers, even obtaining costing for prototypes are all possible avenues where a design could get stolen.

The Internet is no different. In fact, because of the power of the Internet’s reach, the chance could be higher. However I do find it interesting that designers take more precautions showing work at graduation shows or manufacturers than on the Internet.

This being said, I have to say that the case of the copied Pocket Light happens rarely, especially if the stolen design was just a concept. The reason because the additional work required in taking a concept to an actual product requires far more effort than just coming up with an idea. In many cases it is very difficult to do if the designer that came up with the idea is not part of the development team.

That’s why people often tend to rip off finished products like LV bags or Vertu phones. All the hard work has already been done, all you need to do is just reverse engineer it. Oh, and there is that brand element as well.

So how or why did the Pocket Light get stolen? My guess is that it was “The Perfect Storm”. So happens that a manufacturer or a brand had access to all the right ingredients and be in a position to take up that idea and convert it quickly and easily into a product. In my opinion it was just sheer bad luck on the part of Ryan Harc.

2) So then why would anyone want to post his or her designs on the Internet?

There are actually a number of reasons, but the trick here is making sure you figure out “why?” before you do so.

The first and most common reason is credibility. Budding designers or design studios looking to make a name for themselves often share online self initiated design projects with the aim of getting their talent discovered.

If this were your objective, then getting a design copied would then fall in the realm of “imitation is the best form of flattery.” It is unfortunate, but consider milking it for all its worth.

The next reason designers publish designs online is that they are looking for a job. Most of the time these designs are portfolio work that have already been introduced in the market. However there are designers that would include personal design projects or submissions to design competitions hoping to show potential employers the breath of their talent.

The final last two reasons are closely link. That is, designers intending to sell a product or the rights to a design for production. If this is indeed your objective, you should ensure that you have taken the relevant intellectual property protection like patents or design registrations.

An important thing to note is that these 4 points are mutually exclusive. You cannot hope to “gain credibility” and also aim to “sell your design”. Both require different mindsets, and to combine the two is a recipe for disappointment.

3) So what can we do to protect ourselves?

I’m no expert on intellectual property, but by understand the gist of what it can do for you widens your options. Do research the details of Utility Patents, Design Registrations and Trademarks at your nearest Intellectual Property Office as soon as you can.

But for the purpose of this discussion, let us look at IP more from a strategic angle; is IP really needed for what you want to do?

An old employer of mine has this policy on patents. If an idea or invention could be licensed to another party for royalties, then it is worth taking the effort to get a patent. Why is this so? It makes perfect sense when you look at patents from a business point of view.

In certain cases the cost for a patent could come in at USD $30,000-50,000(for a worldwide coverage) or more. This does not include things like patent searches, legal fees and other incidentals. So if you look at it from an ROI (Return on Investment) perspective it just doesn’t not make sense. More so when you consider that most patents are applied on inventions before they are even launched or market proven.

I’m not saying don’t patent your idea. If you think you have a killer idea or invention, then you should really consider investing in a patent. The hard part is figuring out if the idea is really worth it.

Now this comes to the next part of the patent equation. Lets say you managed to pull together $30,000 and got yourself a patent. You now have peace of mind. You launch your product and it becomes a small success. The success is small enough that you don’t rest on your laurels but big enough for the rest of the world to take notice that it is now market proven. Soon cheap imitations start to flood the market while you are struggling to grow your business. The question now is do you have the financial muscle or just simply the willpower to enforce your patent?

Many inventors I have spoken to shared with me that patents are really just for a peace of mind. In certain cases they are useful, in other times, too much of a good thing. At the end of the day the decision is really yours but be aware of what it can do for you, and weigh the pros and cons of that hefty investment.

4) So what shall we do now?

Let me now share with you 4 suggestions on what I think designers can do, considering the landscape I have outlined above.

a) Share it, Get famous and Move on.
Most designers would fall under this category. So when you share designs, you do it to share and celebrate the cleverness of the idea. You may also do it for karma, and in the hope that by sharing, karma comes back to you as fame and maybe even fortune. But at the end of the day you are realistic, you expect nothing in return and quickly move on to the next big idea you come up with.

b) Make it, Share it, Sell it, and Get Out!
One thing about patents they never talk about is that it can be circumvented. There is no guarantee that someone will not takes your idea, modify it and sell it as a better alternative. So one way to play it is that if you think you have a good idea and want to capitalize on it; then a way to do it is to make your money and get out.

ipoor T-Shirt - Design Sojourn

I planned my iPoor T-Shirt project with this strategy in mind. I knew the idea had merit, but with the product being a T-Shirt with a simple silkscreen graphic, I knew anyone could easily copy it. So I hatched a plan to make the iPoor T-Shirt in limited quantities and once it sold out, I’m out of the game. This strategy also forces you to ensure costs, margins and return on investment all work they way you want it.

c) Share it to Stake your Claim to the World.
I’m sure you can relate to my situation. I’m an employed designer, struggling to make ends meet, but I have ideas and some savings to invest in it. So how can I leverage on the power of the Internet to help me? I know I can’t afford a patent, so what do I do? I share it and stake my claim to the world, and if the design gets ripped off people will hopefully “do the right thing”.

Spaces for Ideas Sketchbook : Design Sojourn

My Spaces for Ideas Sketchbook is one such project, where by engaging my readers for feedback and getting them to be part of the development process, I hope to build a following of people that have a strong relationship with the product. Furthermore, by showing my process and prototype, there is no doubt as who came up with the idea first and when.

As a side note, the final design has not been revealed as it is in the process of getting a Design Registration. This is an alternative to a patent and not as expensive. Did I mention Google Design Registrations?

d) Go under the Radar
My last suggestion does depend on the nature of your product, design or invention. Akin to much of the things you will find on Etsy, going “under the radar” means you build a design so niche, unusual to make, or not inline to existing standard processes that it becomes difficult to copy.

Read the full original article here:

http://www.yankodesign.com/2010/01/22/how-to-manage-your-creative-work-and-intellectual-property-online/

Written by Brian Ling – a multidisciplinary industrial design leader that goes under the pseudonym of “The Design Translator”. He muses about the art of design leadership and the business of strategic industrial design over at his website Design Sojourn. He often laments the lack of good soy mochas and Italian pizzas (with Rocket and shredded Parma ham) in Asia.

  • Share/Bookmark

Hidden cost of studying in the Arts

Student Union Arts London are fighting to uncover an evil that we know is true everywhere - the horrific hidden costs of studying an Arts course!

SUARTS are campaigning to ensure that any additional course costs (on top of tuition fees) are upfront, transparent and reasonable.

This means additional course costs should be stated on all Entry Profiles, there should be no compulsory fees further to those stated, there should be support and structured programmes in place to help students with their fundraising and sponsorship and student should receive a breakdown of what their additional fees have been spent on.
Currently additional course costs are administered on an ad hoc basis that varies widely across different colleges and courses – some students are asked to pay £100 towards materials at the beginning of each term. After this, the extra costs students are asked to pay could be almost anything. Often sprung upon students with little or no notice and at difficult times of the year. This affects every student, but we all know that those from lower income backgrounds and those hard up of cash are going to suffer the most.

It is not unknown for students to enter the last few weeks of Uni not knowing whether they will be able to afford the obscene amounts of money that are needed for a Final Show.

We accept that costs for materials must come from somewhere, but if students are going to be asked to pay for something which they need for their course, the University needs be upfront, transparent and reasonable. Something which currently does not happen.
Over the course of the next term SUARTs be collecting raw data on the extent of the hidden course costs that you have to face. We will be distributing blank Compulsory Costs guides (through Course Reps) so you can all feed in to this. This will be analysed to highlight the breadth and disparity of the problem. This will then be taken to the University to ensure these are addressed and to highlight the absurdity and unfairness of the situation.

What can you do?
• Report any ‘surprise’ costs that you are asked to cover this year by emailing campaigns@su.arts.ac.uk
• Fill in your blank Compulsory Costs Pro Forma when it is distributed this term
• Stand as a Course Rep!

Last week their travelling campaign ‘Hidden Costs’ went on a whistlestop tour of all the University of the Arts London colleges.

They gathered pics of students looking surprised by these outrageous extra costs -looks like they had fun!Ssee the facebook group (tinyurl.com/UALhiddencosts), tag yourself to be in with a chance of winning some great prizes! Prizes include…
DAB Digital Radio
£50 cash
£20 HMV vouchers
and other mystery prizes!

Winners will be announced 22nd January

http://www.suarts.org/content/213845

  • Share/Bookmark

Looking towards 2020

Check out Arts Council England's ideas for a ten-year 'politician proof' funding plan.

In an effort to define how they will work with artists and arts organisations to create positive change for the arts over the next 10 years, Arts Council provide the following information and ask for your ideas and opinions.

Where are we now?

How we sit within a diverse and ever-changing England, taking into account the progression of society, industry, technology and the environment.

Our vision

Our ambitions for the next 10 years, encompassing diversity, internationalism, strengthened organisations and heightened excellence across the arts.

Realising our vision

How we will adapt and change with society and the arts to achieve our ambitions.

Literature review

Our 2009 review of recent literature relating to the arts in England, developed to inform our 10-year strategic framework.

To give them your feedback you’ll need to register with Arts Council.

Do it.

http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/consultation/

  • Share/Bookmark

Inaugural Arts Group Meeting: What’s It All About?

In the lead up to the forthcoming meeting in Lincoln, February 11th-12th, we poked Chair of Arts Group, Kit Friend, for some more details on what to expect and what to come armed with.

Could you tell us a little more about the February meeting in Lincoln?
The February meeting is our first “standard” meeting of 2010. We will use it to discuss progress and activity, issues facing members, and in particular to discuss motions to the NUS Annual conference in April.

What will happen here?
We’ll be planning activities for the next few months, discussing policy proposals, and holding open space technology. There will also be our fabulous evening social activity planned by our events officer, with plenty of opportunity to make the acquaintance of other Arts-concerned officers and reps from around the country.

Key points to be discussed?
Internships & STEM research funding concentration

Who will attend?
Student reps and officers from institutions with creative courses

What are the benefits of attending?

Opportunity to input into policy discussion and activity, learning from experience and practice of others.

What to bring?
Yourselves, positive attitude to change, issues and ideas from your local activities

Aims and outcomes?
To generate policy and progress for creative students, in particular to influence the National Arts Student Summit and NUS annual conference as well as other activities due soon.

Thanks Kit!

  • Share/Bookmark

How They Did It: Alistair Hall

Alistair Hall, Director of We Made This Ltd. and one of the guides for Central Saint Martins’ Innovation program, shares with us his journey from graduate to running his own studio, blogging and how failure can ultimately lead to success.

Alistair Hall giving a talk at Immersion, the careers course at Central Saint Martins

Tell us your elevator pitch:

We Made This is a London based graphic design studio specialising in delicious print work.

Did you have any business knowledge prior to setting up your company?
I had worked as a production assistant for a commercial production company (the Paul Weiland Film Company) making TV commercials for a couple of years before starting my degree at St Martins, which helped teach me how to multi-task. After my degree I worked at CDT for a year and a half, where I learnt a huge amount about the process of working with clients, budgeting, pitching, presenting and so on, as well as about pure design. Then I got a place on NESTA’s Creative Pioneer Programme, (a sort of precursor of the Immersion programme) where we were taught a lot about the nuts and bolts of running a business. I run We Made This on my own, and share a studio with two other design companies, David Pearson Design and Fitzroy & Finn.

When you were growing up what did you want to be and what happened which made you become what you are now?

I’m not sure I ever wanted to be anything particular. Actually, scratch that, I wanted to be a film director. That’s why I started working in commercials, but after a while I realised it wasn’t for me. While I was looking at jobs in that industry, I read a book called something like Diaires of Film-makers – it was a Faber & Faber book which detailed the daily lives of a variety of folk working in the film industry. One of the diaries was from a film producer, and she talked about going to meet the guys who were making the poster for her film. I knew instantly that I didn’t want to make films, but to make posters instead.

What do you wish you had been told in University about the real world?

Nothing. College is a good time to dream. Though it might have been useful to know how long it takes to pay off a student loan. But heck, even if I had known, I’m not sure I would have done anything differently.

Have there been any big mistakes/failures which have lead to success?
NESTA were offering business funding to some of the folk on the course, and I didn’t succeed in getting that funding. I think if I had got it, my journey might have been quite different. Whether that would have been a better or worse sort of different… tricky to know. I’m happy where I am though.

What can you only learn on the job?
You learn a huge amount once you start work, and you keep learning. Don’t expect to be perfect when you start. But be honest about the fact that you’re not perfect.

How important do you think having an online presence is and how signficant a role does your blog play in marketing your service?
I find it difficult to quantify it to be honest. Obviously having work online is really important – people rely on being able to see your stuff immediately. Jobs are just starting to come in on the back of the blog, which is great. I’m in the middle of building a new site – once that’s up, I’ll have a bit of a marketing push.

You’ve had interns at We Made This, what do you look for when choosing potential students/ graduates to join your team?

Brilliant work and a general air of loveliness.

We Made This Ltd

  • Share/Bookmark

Intellectual Property Rights for the creative industries – where to begin

Artists, photographers, designers, illustrators, graphic artists, product designers and anyone else who is creative and produces original creative works owns some intellectual property rights in what they create. If you are reading this thinking “that is me!” read on, as this article gives you the basics about intellectual property rights, usually referred to as “IPR”.

Melissa Henderson, from 10 Park Signs

So, what is IPR? Well, put simply it is legal property in original work. But unlike your house, your car or your MP3 player, IPR is intangible. This means that it isn’t the type of property you can hold and pass around. Rather, it is the type of property which bestows on the owner certain legal rights – the right not to be copied for example. If anyone reproduces or copies someone’s original work without their permission they will breach or infringe that person’s IPR. So, it is important for creative people to understand IPR, particularly if they are using their creative works commercially. There are various different types of IPR which exist depending on the type of creative work you might produce. The main types are copyright, design right, trade marks and patents, and very briefly: Copyright exists automatically in creative works such as artistic works (paintings, illustrations, photographs etc.), literary works (writing, songs, music, software code etc.), dramatic works (plays, structured dance choreography etc.). More information about copyright may be found here [link to copyright article]; Design right exists both automatically and also if the owner chooses to register via a form of Government registration in illustrated design drawings (line drawings, CAD drawings etc.) from which a 3D product can be made. More information about design right may be found here [link to design right article]; Trade marks exist both through their use over time and also if the owner chooses to register via a form of Government registration of trade marks in names (e.g. an artist’s name) or other marks (e.g. a logo) under by which a business is identified. More information about trade marks may be found here [link to trade marks article]; Patents exist only if the owner chooses to register via a form of Government registration of patents in inventions (i.e. new ideas which improve technology). This is less relevant to artists and designers and so is just mentioned here for completeness. As you will be able to tell from the above, this IPR is valuable property because if you create something original, be it a piece of artwork, a graphic illustration or a photograph, if it is good, others may wish to use it commercially (e.g. to use as an album cover or to sell as a collection) and because the creator owns IPR in their work, anyone who does want to reproduce that work commercially must obtain the owner’s permission (for which the owner may charge). This is called licensing of IPR.

  • Share/Bookmark